While watching our last area womens team hoop its way through the final days of March Madness last week, I made an offhand remark about wishing Id been competitive in collegiate athletics.
Why didnt you put in the hours? asked my partner, ever the pragmatist.
Simple, I replied. I was trying to graduate on time.
By virtue of occupation, I hear a lot about what schools, programs and parents have or havent done to balance academic preparation and athletic success.
Each of the stories from news briefs about signing day for local preps players, to the ongoing tempest at UNC, to the push to unionize football at Northwestern University is framed as an issue of money, but they are also linked by one key element: time.
According to journalist Malcolm Gladwell, whose 2000 book The Tipping Point examined the factors contributing to diverse measures of success, its 10,000 hours. Thats the amount of practice time it will take for todays elementary-age athlete to make it into the pros. It presumably includes time spent in ones undergraduate years.
But the figure says nothing about the overwhelming majority of student athletes who wont (or dont) seek to advance beyond collegiate play; the ones who also split their time between sport and scholarship, knowing that the former is simply a means to an end for earning a degree, and with it, traditional economic advancement. Thats where a proposal from UNC professor Steven King comes in.
4 + 2 is Kings pitch for improving learning conditions for D-I athletes. The website OnfieldInfield.com details a plan that extends the learning time (and money) available to student-athletes.
One of the coaches for the football team and I are buddies. We were talking at dinner and realized that there was no way the players could be successful in my class, King told me.
King is the former director of video at The Washington Post. He joined the UNC School of Journalism & Graphic Communication faculty in 2011; and teaches multimedia classes including several that keep students in the basement, working until the wee hours of the morning.
These players have a full-time, physically demanding job, he said of student athletes. And then we expect them to be successful as a student.
By decreasing course loads to just six hours during the season, nine in the off-season, and adding two years to allow student athletes to be just that, King and his partner present a proposal that gives students who want their degrees more time to complete them.
Students who want to take more classes can, but those who are burdened by long hours on the road, grueling practices and the supplementary work it takes to compete as a D-I level athlete would be able to scale back a bit.
King says the proposal has been met with both enthusiasm and doubt.
Some worry that if they have more time, theyll have more time to get in to trouble, he said. He also acknowledges that while the proposal is feasible for financially robust programs at schools like UNC, it might not work for other institutions where scholarship funds are tight.
A quality education
Still, its an innovation approach, and one I hope gains enough traction for a hearing. Bubba Cunningham, athletic director of UNC, says its one of several ideas currently being discussed on campus.
I think a lot of people are trying to figure out the best way to deliver a quality education to college athletes, and this is one of them, he said, calling in from Dallas, where hed just landed for a meeting of ADs that coincided with the mens Final Four.
The big opportunity to have the proposal heard could come in January 2015, when the NCAA will meet to discuses proposed rule changes. In the interim, King is focused on gathering momentum behind the idea.
He is to be commended. The ongoing fray about the balance between extra-curricular activities and scholarship is often treated as zero-sum equation rather than a creative problem to be examined and tested with innovative approaches.
Rather than criticism, communities united around schools and teams could offer constructive insights for improvement. Mine? Create an athletic-track degree that will prepare students for careers tangential to their areas of sports specialization. Include the courses were not currently teaching in high school and college negotiating agreements as a lay person, financial literacy, managing your own brand.
If were going to keep revenue sports tied to college education, we should give students the opportunity to take an interdisciplinary approach to excel within their wheelhouse so that they emerge with both a degree and an opportunity to carry their talent and passion for sport to the next level.
Undoubtedly, there are a number of ideas out there from people invested in the issue parents to educators, administrators and even players themselves.
The 4 + 2 proposal demonstrates that theres more we can do than just comment and criticize and buy our season tickets for next years games.
As a community of alumni, faculty, students and fans, we can contribute. Whether its through drawing attention to proposals like 4 + 2, or demanding greater accountability from institutions that shape our student athletes, theres plenty of room for all of us to get in this game.
Meredith Clark is the editor of the North Raleigh News and the Midtown Raleigh News. Contact her via email at firstname.lastname@example.org..